What is the legal standard for admissibility of evidence?

The legal standard for admissibility of evidence centers on its relevance and reliability in the context of the case. Evidence must be relevant to the issues at hand, meaning it should make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. Additionally, the evidence must be material, which pertains to its significance in influencing the case's outcome. Importantly, it must also be obtained lawfully, adhering to constitutional protections against illegal searches and seizures. Lastly, evidence must be reliable, meaning it is trustworthy and credible. This comprehensive standard ensures that only evidence that fairly contributes to a case’s determination is presented in court.

Other choices do not capture these essential elements. For example, public knowledge pertains to information commonly known by the public and does not address the specific legal criteria for evidence admissibility. Collecting evidence solely by a witness does not encompass all types of evidence or methods that can be admissible in court. The requirement for documentation by a camera is also not a standard for admissibility; various forms of evidence, such as testimony or documents, can be admissible without being visually documented.